Here is an example
of how the Druridge Bay field ponds fluctuate in area depending on the
rainfall. This might be an even more existential questions: can you have a pond
that has no water in it, is it still a pond? Yes it is, although I am not sure
how long you can go before saying it is no longer a pond. My personal
preference would be years. I am sure there will be ponds in some desert habitat
that only fill very rarely with long hard dry years in between. The pond in the
photos above is just in the field to the right hand side of the entrance to
Ellington Caravan Park. It is wet most years and well established. On the left
is the pond in mid July 2012. Yes, those are rain drops smudging the lens.
Still, it is not lashing rain so this must have been a particularly dry day
given the deluge of 2012. On the left July 2014. No water an there had not been
for a while, instead carpet of weeds that weave a distinct carpet over the
exposed earth. Mayweeds and annual meadow grass, bistorts and cudweed. In 2012
the plant life was dominated by other species growing luxuriantly in the damp
summer, although the overall tick list was much the same.
Which is the better
pond? That could be a classic question asked of conservationists. Is it the
overflowing quagmire of 2012 with thick tufts of toad rush and even underwater
starworts? Or maybe the dried out mayweed and cudweed carpet of 2014. Both are good,
both are typical of the Druridge fields. The differences between years do not
matter, they are part of the natural disturbance and change. The real challenge
will be if the local wildlife is exposed to weather conditions so different to
anything they are used to that they cannot cope. The plants seemed to cope with
2012 but I do not know about the invertebrates because I was not monitoring
them Butterflies took a massive hit, but butterflies like it sunny and dry. I
am worried that the invertebrates may have been hit harder than we know,
especially those with flying adult stages to their life history